Dave Adams chairs the International Christian Media Commission, the Institute’s parent body. Dave helped the 2020 Vision conference to think through the challenges we face in the coming years and offered this challenge at the end of the event.
I've been in and around Christian broadcasting for more than 50 years and I've seen it change and I've seen it stop changing and just carrying on doing what it's always done. And that troubles me. As I have met with you this week and have heard about the passion you have, the quality of ministry that you are engaged with, I have come to feel that this group of people could begin a turning point in the way that the Christian Church understands its relationships with the media and how to engage with them. I want to challenge us to seriously re-engage with the question of the relationship between the Church and the media.
Over the years, as radio and television and later other media developed, there was a sense in which to use these tools required professional development. So we trained and set up standards that we aspired to achieve, and it was important to do that. But we were professionalising the media in doing so. In this conference we have realised that the world has changed so much that we need to change as well.
Much of what has changed has
been in two areas: in the technologies that are available to us to
communicate with one another and in the culture in which we are now
serving. Both of these have changed fundamentally from when ICTI was
born and when I first, as a twenty-one-year-old, went into radio
ministry. It’s a different world and I think that calls on us as media
practitioners to change the way we think about what we do.
For much of that history, the Church, if it paid any attention to what we do at all, saw us in its outreach to the world. It saw the possibility of big radio stations and television networks as an opportunity to tell the world of Christ, while the Church got on looking after the children. And we did that all over the world and sometimes with some success. But there was a big gap between our espoused purpose and our actual purpose, between what we said we would do and what we really have accomplished. The world has drifted further away from Christ while we have been trying to bring the world to Christ. And that has been the challenge. I think the changes in the technology, the changes in the culture, require of us a very different way of thinking about whom we are and what we do as media practitioners. What is our mission going forward?
want to suggest, and this is only my personal reflection, that I think
the professionalised Christian media, needs to turn away from its
attention to the world back to the Church.
We sometimes, in talking about the media, talk about three roles. It entertains, and that is important. We need to attract people to what we do and we need to be creative. So, our production work needs to be seen as an artistic activity. That is important.
We also, of course, see our work as informative. The media are disseminating information, journalism, good quality interrogation of the subject matter that we are seeking to communicate.
But we sometimes forget that the media are also an instrument for education. And my challenge to myself, as much as to anyone else, is to ask whether we can we re-focus the attention we give to the media more on an educational role? In a world in which there is so much choice, so many channels for people to attend to, it's becoming increasingly likely that most people in the world will not even find us in the media. It's been difficult in the past when we were on one or two channels in a given language to attract an audience. Just being a bit more creative with what we do is not going to bring more people to listen to us.
My feeling is the Christian media should forget talking to the world and talk to the Church with a particular mission of education. Why do I say that? Because under the blessing of God the Church is now present in almost all the world, sometimes flourishing, sometimes struggling. But in many local churches the quality of discipleship is poor. That is because the pastors are not well trained. They themselves do not have the theological knowledge, the skills of opening the word of God to the people. As a result the Church is not as effective as it could be as a witness in its own community. The people who live in that community are potentially the most effective evangelists and apostles to that community. But they are not equipped to do it very often.
I believe that if we could think about our primary role as professional media practitioners, to be to equip the Church in its life, ministry and its mission, it could transform the impact of every local Church around the world. That is a huge challenge and I want to suggest that it is done in partnership with the Church. That is that there is a way of developing a pedagogy in our media ministry to the Church that relies on it being applied within the local community so that what we provide in equipping, in helping to equip the Church to think more, to pray and to work for the kingdom will be more effective.
in society are not bad at doing good. We tend to be compassionate,
caring. There are outreaches and loving and gentle kind of involvement
in the community. We run food programmes; we address questions of
poverty reasonably well. Our behaviour is reasonably ok.
Go down another level to the relationship aspects and our relationships with our communities is weaker. We are not as engaged as we could be in civil society. We are not bringing a Christian voice to the things that really matter to everyone who lives in that community. And when you go down to the mindset level many of our churches and individual Christians do not have a reason for the hope that is within them. I think Peter tries to challenge us to say, 'What is the worldview that underpins the hope that you have in Christ?' That means challenging our thinking about every aspect of the world in which we live and work. What are the drivers to our culture? What are the drivers that are bringing people to become so dependent on the technologies that are now being made available to us?
But here is my second thought about that. If we
turn our focus to the Church with a stronger commitment to equip it in
its mission and ministry we will find that the Church has actually a lot
of technology available to itself. We will discover that we need to
start thinking about every person as a producer. They have their mobile
phones and they are interacting with their small audiences all the time
of every day in the posts that they put on Facebook, in the comments
they put to an Instagram post or on YouTube, in tweets that they put on
Twitter. They are communicating with their networks through this
technology. Are they equipped to do that? Are they doing it in a
Christian way? Is their Christian faith being expressed in that quick
instant comment they make to a Facebook posting?
So here we are, we have got churches full of young people and while the sermon is being preached they are on their mobile phones. Would it not be lovely if they were equipped to be able to reflect what they hear from the pulpit to their own networks in real time, letting the little networks of people they know hear about, listen to, engage with the reflections that they are having. That, I think, is a future call for media training. How do we as media trainers train every person to use the media? Not just a little professional group. That is a huge challenge.
that is my reflection on what we have been doing. We have been talking
about a lot of things we can do. How do we change the way we work, the
systems in which we operate? Reconfigure the resources that we need so
that we can help the professional Christian broadcasting or media
community, re-focus its attention on equipping the Church. Except we
will not reach the world in that incredibly competitive environment. But
the Church will listen. The Church will hear us. We can find that
audience and we can develop it.
Christians in the churches who do watch Christian media often live in two different worlds. They suffer the local Church and they enjoy the television evangelists. That is wrong. What if a professional Christian voice was offered in such a way that to complete the learning they have to be working on that content in their local communities and asking 'What does it mean to me?' 'How do I interpret my experience in the light of the teaching that I am receiving?' And then equip the Church to be able to pass that on to their own community.
That is my reaction to our time together. I ask you to just think about it and ask whether that is part of the mission of ICTI? We are trainers. We have huge influence on the Church in terms of the response it can have. What do we want to do about it?